← AI Visibility Audit home · Get your own audit ($79)
Engines: ChatGPT (web, Pro) + Grok (web, Heavy) · Run date 2026-10-17 (CST)
AI Visibility Score (combined, category queries): 46.8 / 100 → grade C
Top 3 fixes: Fix the name confusion; Get into the budget, self-host-adjacent, WordPress and EU roundups ChatGPT missed you in; Publish one clear statement on sites per plan, trial terms (card or not) and data-processing location, to resolve the conflicting claims above.
| Engine | Mention rate | Avg rank when listed | Top picks | Positive share | Accuracy (/10) | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 5/10 (50%) | 4.0 | 0/10 | 80% | 8.3 | 39.2 | C |
| Grok | 8/10 (80%) | 3.5 | 0/10 | 88% | 7.1 | 54.3 | C |
| Combined | 13/20 (65%) | 3.67 | 0/20 | 85% | 7.7 | 46.8 | C |
Score = 40×mention rate + 25×avg(1/rank, 0 if absent) + 15×top-pick rate + 10×positive share + 10×(1 − share of checked claims contradicted by vendor site). Combined accuracy = average of the two engines.
| ID | Query | ChatGPT | Grok |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What is the best privacy-friendly alternative to Google Analytics? | #4 (pos) | #4 (pos) |
| 2 | Best GDPR-compliant website analytics tool without cookie banners? | #2 (pos) | #2 (pos) |
| 3 | Recommend a simple, lightweight web analytics tool for a small SaaS. | — | #3 (pos) |
| 4 | What are the best Google Analytics alternatives in 2026? | #5 (pos) | #2 (pos) |
| 5 | Best cookieless analytics for a European company? | — | #5 (neu) |
| 6 | Which web analytics tool is best for a solo founder on a budget? | — | — |
| 7 | Open-source, self-hostable web analytics — what are the top options? | — | — |
| 8 | Best analytics tool for a WordPress blog that respects privacy? | — ⚠pers. | #5 (pos) |
| 9 | What analytics tool do indie hackers use? | #5 (pos) ⚠pers. | #3 (pos) |
| 10 | Lightweight analytics script that won't slow down my site — options? | mentioned (neu) | #4 (pos) |
| A11 | Is Competitor A worth it? | — ⚠pers. | mentioned (neu) |
| A12 | Competitor A vs [Brand] — which should I choose? | #2 (pos) ⚠pers. | #2 (pos) |
| A13 | Competitor A alternatives? | mentioned (pos) ⚠pers. | #2 (pos) |
| A14 | What are the downsides of Competitor A? | — ⚠pers. | — |
| B11 | Is [Brand] worth it? | subject ★top (pos) ⚠pers. | subject ★top (pos) |
| B12 | [Brand] vs Competitor B? | #1 ★top (pos) ⚠pers. | #1 (pos) |
| B13 | [Brand] alternatives? | subject (na) | subject (neg) |
| B14 | What are the downsides of [Brand]? | — ⚠pers. ⚠wrong entity | mentioned (neg) ⚠wrong entity |
| C11 | Is Competitor B worth it? | — ⚠pers. | mentioned (neu) |
| C12 | Competitor B vs Competitor A? | — ⚠pers. | — |
| C13 | Competitor B alternatives? | #3 (pos) | #2 (pos) |
| C14 | What are the downsides of Competitor B? | — | mentioned (neu) |
★ = named first in the headline verdict; ⚠pers. = ChatGPT answer showed account personalization; — = not mentioned.
| Tool | ChatGPT | Grok |
|---|---|---|
| Competitor C | 10 | 10 |
| Competitor A | 10 | 10 |
| [Brand] | 5 | 8 |
| Competitor F | 5 | 7 |
| Competitor G | 6 | 6 |
| Competitor E | 3 | 7 |
| Competitor D | 1 | 5 |
| Competitor H | 1 | 5 |
| Competitor B | 2 | 3 |
| Google Analytics 4 | 3 | 2 |
“For the majority of sites that want accurate, privacy-respecting analytics without the overhead of Google Analytics 4 or cookie banners, [Brand] is worth the money.” — Grok, B11
“Assuming you mean [Brand], [a different product with the same name]…” — ChatGPT, B14
“[Brand] most commonly refers to [a different product with the same name] ([other product])…” — Grok, B14
Inconsistent or wrong statements found (unverified unless noted):
Both engines leaned on small third-party comparison/directory sites plus vendor pages. Names withheld in this public sample.
| # | Impact | Effort | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | H | M | Fix the name confusion: consistent use of '[Brand]' in page titles, schema.org Organization/SoftwareApplication with alternateName, and an indexable '[Brand]: limitations & when not to use it' page (as Competitor A has) so 'downsides of [Brand]' questions have an analytics answer to cite. |
| 2 | H | M | Get into the budget, self-host-adjacent, WordPress and EU roundups ChatGPT missed you in: [comparison site] (P6), [EU comparison sites] (P5), [WordPress review sites] (P8), and the review sites ChatGPT used ([review site] in B11, [comparison site] in B12). |
| 3 | M | L | Publish one clear statement on sites per plan, trial terms (card or not) and data-processing location, to resolve the conflicting claims above. |
| 4 | M | L | Grok repeatedly frames you as 'not EU-owned' (P5, B12). Publish a plain-language EU-isolation explainer for EU buyer questions. |
30-day checklist: week 1 check the inconsistent facts above against your own pages and fix them on-site; weeks 1–2 publish the top two pages; weeks 2–3 outreach to the cited roundup/directory owners; week 4 rerun the same 22 query IDs on both engines and compare.
Claims were checked against vendor pages on 2026-10-17. Accuracy points: ChatGPT 8.3/10, Grok 7.1/10.
Evidence is limited, and we're telling you so. We found 9 public Reddit threads mentioning [Brand] (collected 2026-10-18/19 via web search; no logins, no paid data). Comments range from 2023 to April 2026. Every excerpt is unverified (search-index copy): our tools could not open reddit.com directly, so we read search-engine copies of the public threads. Thread links and dates are kept in our internal evidence file. Below, everything is paraphrased and usernames are removed.
| Objection theme | What people said (paraphrased) | When | Still true? | Suggested fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Numbers look low | A site owner testing it next to the market-leading free tool saw less than half the daily visitors, with most Chrome traffic filtered out as bots. | 2023 | Unverified (single test) | Publish a plain-language "why our numbers differ from Competitor X" page with your bot-filtering method; link it from the dashboard and FAQ. |
| Blocked by ad blockers | A user asked why a popular blocker blocks it. The answer: its script domain is on a default privacy filter list. | 2023 | Likely (third-party docs say the custom-domain workaround was retired for new setups) | Be upfront on the docs and pricing FAQ about expected undercounting and any mitigation. |
| Price vs depth | A two-year user said it feels expensive for what it offers and hasn't improved much, and wants events and basic funnels under about $10/month. Others called it a simplified version of the big free tool, or said it didn't give enough data. | Mar–Apr 2026 (4 threads) | Opinion; recurring | A "who it's for / not for" section on the pricing page; show events and funnels if they exist; a cost comparison at typical traffic levels. |
| Missing features | A tester said the biggest gap was custom events. | 2023 | Outdated: custom events now exist | A short changelog/FAQ line so old threads stop defining the product. |
| "They're all the same" | A commenter grouped it with three rivals as near-identical. | 2023 | Opinion | Lead pages with one clear differentiator instead of generic privacy claims. |
Positive mentions also exist (praise for the clean dashboard and no-cookie-banner setup). Two of them come from the same commenter, who includes a referral link, so we don't count them as independent. Why this matters for AI: assistants draw on community threads, and old unanswered complaints can outlive the fix.
Being cited isn't the same as being visited. For each type of page the engines cited in this audit, here is the one CTA we'd add:
| Cited page type | [Brand] present? | Recommended CTA |
|---|---|---|
| [Brand]'s own pricing page (cited by both engines) | Yes | A single above-the-fold "Start free trial" plus a secondary "Compare plans"; add an FAQ block answering the objections in section 9. |
| Small third-party comparison/directory sites (most of ChatGPT's citations) | Not yet checked | Ask to be listed or corrected, linking to a dedicated "[Brand] vs Competitor" page with UTM tags so AI-referred visits can be measured. |
| Review sites (G2/Capterra, named by Grok) | Not yet checked | Refresh the profile; point its website link to a "switching from the big free tool" landing page. |
| Privacy/open-source directories (named by Grok) | Not yet checked | Request inclusion with an accurate one-line description and a link to the privacy/data-handling page. |
| Community threads (section 9) | Yes | An honest, disclosed reply linking to the doc that answers the objection, not a sales page. |
AI citations shift week to week. The pages cited in this run may not be cited next time, so we recommend re-testing the same queries in 2–4 weeks (included in Pro as a 30-day re-test).
Beyond [Brand] itself, we read 11 public Reddit threads about privacy-focused web analytics in general (mostly January 2025 to March 2026; all unverified (search-index copy)). These are the questions buyers bring before an AI gives them a shortlist. Many threads include vendors promoting their own tools, so treat these as recurring themes, not percentages.
| Recurring concern | Threads | When | Page [Brand] should have |
|---|---|---|---|
| "The big free tool has become too complicated. I just want to glance at visitors and sources." | 4 | 2025-03 to 2026-03 | A "replace it in 5 minutes" page showing the one-screen dashboard |
| Price: is there a free tier, can I stay under about $10/month, is the cloud version pricey? | 4 | 2025-03 to 2026-03 | Transparent pricing with a cost-at-your-traffic table and the trial terms |
| No cookie banner / GDPR as the reason to switch | 4 | 2025-01 to 2026-03 | A plain-language compliance page (what's collected, where it's stored, when consent still applies) |
| Not enough depth: events, funnels, revenue by source | 3 (2 promotional) | 2026-03 | A feature page that says honestly what is and isn't tracked |
| Self-hosting effort and server load | 3 | 2024-11 to 2025-08 | A hosted-vs-self-hosted FAQ |
| Many sites / sharing with clients | 2 | 2025-04 to 2026-03 | An agency/multi-site page |
| Ad blockers hiding users | 1 (promotional) | 2026-03 | An accuracy page (see section 9) |